10. Binding Energy

Mysteries can hang around in physics for decades. One of these is the 90-year-old Case of the Baffling Binding Energy.

When two particles, like a proton and a neutron, fuse together into a nucleus, they lose a bit of mass. This lost mass has the name Mass Defect. Because of our old friend E = m ∙ c2, this loss of mass is also known as the Binding Energy.

As each proton or neutron is added to a nucleus, there is a little more Binding Energy released. But it’s not (as one might expect) the same amount each time. Here is how nucleons, i.e., protons & neutrons, make different nuclei of different atoms as they are added:

AtomProtonsNeutrons
Deuterium11
Tritium12
Helium 321
Helium 22
Helium 523
Lithium 33
Lithium 734
Beryllium44
Beryllium 945
Beryllium 1046
Boron55
Carbon66
The number of nucleons in the nucleus of small atoms.

If we divide the total Binding Energy released to form each of these nuclei by the number of particles in each we get the following very strange curve:

Binding energy per nucleon for small atoms.

The sawtooth nature of this curve has baffled physics for 90 years. Undaunted, physicists have made a few attempts to explain this.

The first idea was proposed in 1929 by George Gamow. By modelling each nucleon as a drop of liquid, he was able to come up with the following Liquid Drop Model (LDM):

Liquid Drop Model of Binding Energy per nucleon.

As a match to the data the shape is great but the absolute fit to the data is pretty poor. The absolute error is 55% but the correlation with the data (that is, how well the model matches the shape of the curve) is pretty good at 0.991.

The next advance took a long time, until in the 1990’s Norman Cook put forth the Face-Centered Cubic model. In this model, the nucleon formed the same pattern as a Face-Centered Cubic crystal structure. This gave:

Face-Centered-Cubic model of Binding Energy per nucleon.

Here we see a much better fit tot he data, only 11% absolute error, but the fit to the shape of the curve is pretty bad, resulting in correlation of only 0.915.

The New Physics model of the Binding Energy curve is 7 times better fit to the data:

The New Physics model of the Binding Energy per nucleon.

Here the absolute error is only 1.4% and the correlation is 0.999. This is 7 times better than the FCC model, a 700% improvement.

This extraordinary advance is a result of The New Physics models of the proton and the neutron.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.